PELANGGARAN MAKSIM KESANTUNAN BERBAHASA PADA KOLOM KOMENTAR TIKTOK TVONE NEWS TENTANG PEMBATASAN AKUN ANAK DI BAWAH 16 TAHUN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30739/peneroka.v6i2.5315Keywords:
Politeness, Leech Maxims, Public Policy, Social Media, TikTok.Abstract
This study aims to analyze the forms and impacts of violations of politeness maxims based on Leech's Principle of Politeness theory in the comments section of the TikTok account @tvonenews regarding the social media account accounting policy for children under 16 years of age. The study used a non-geographic descriptive qualitative approach. The research data consisted of netizens' comments collected through listening, note-taking, and documentation techniques, then explained based on Leech's six politeness maxims. The results showed 29 violations spread across six types of maxims. The most violations occurred in the Humility Maxim, the Approval Maxim, and the Sympathy Maxim, with six data each, which indicated a tendency for netizens to convey criticism arrogantly, reject opinions confrontationally, and ignore empathy in responding to public policies. In contrast, only one violation of the Generosity Maxim was found because the communication context in the TikTok comment section rarely requires self-sacrifice. These findings indicate that violations of politeness principles have the potential to reduce the quality of public communication, increase trust in government policies, and strengthen opinion polarization in the digital space.
Downloads
References
Abellia, Wahidy, A., & Puspita, Y. (2026). Analisis prinsip kesantunan berbahasa dalam komentar netizen di media sosial TikTok. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 11(02), 236–247.
Abubakar, R. (2021). Pengantar metodologi penelitian. Yogyakarta: SUKA-Press UIN Sunan Kalijaga.
Adriani, A., Muhamad, D., & Yusrina, Y. (2024). Kesantunan Berbahasa pada Pesan Singkat Grup Whatsapp Mahasiswa PBSI Unkhair sebagai Media Komunikasi Daring: Teori Kesantunan Leech (Pendekatan Pragmatik). Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, dan Sastra, 10(3), 2956-2963.
Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Bhakti, SE (2020). Ruang publik dan media sosial: partisipasi politik mahasiswa indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Media, 4(1), 1-10.
Hida, N. (2025). Ketidaksantunan Berbahasa Dalam Kolom Komentar Video Monolog Gibran “Generasi Mudad, Bonus Demografi Dan Masa Depan Indonesia”. Indonesian Journal of Linguistics, 2(1), 59-68.
Indrayanti, T., Andini, I., Ni’maturrochmah, A., & Utari, J. W. D. (2025). Pematuhan dan Pelanggaran Prinsip Kesantunan Warganet dalam Kolom Komentar Instagram@ Prabowo. Prosiding Konferensi Linguistik Tahunan Atma Jaya (KOLITA), 23(23).
Lailiyah, N., & Wulansari, W. (2016). Peningkatan keterampilan berbicara melalui metode diskusi kelompok model tanam paksa siswa kelas X Pemasaran 1 SMK PGRI 2 Kediri. JP (Jurnal Pendidikan): Teori Dan Praktik, 1(2), 166-173.
Mahsun. (2014). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan Strategi, Metode, dan Tekniknya. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Malikha, U. (2025). Fenomena Perubahan Etika Berbahasa Remaja Dalam Komentar Tiktok: Analisis Pragmatik Kritis. Klausa (Kajian Linguistik, Pembelajaran Bahasa, Dan Sastra) , 9 (2), 56 - 66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33479/klausa.v9i2.1334
Marisya, M., Sinaga, M., & Sari, S. P. (2025). Pelanggaran Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Pesan WhatsApp Mahasiswa Kepada Dosen. JIIP-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(7), 7255-7260.
Novia Nasyomia, & Rizky Dwi Pradana. (2026). Perlindungan Anak Di Ruang Digital: Tinjauan Pendidikan Islam Terhadap Kebijakan Pembatasan Usia Pengguna Media Sosial. Al-Zayn : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum , 4 (2), 5047–5056. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i2.5067
Rahardi, R. K., Setyaningsih, Y., & Dewi, R. P. (2018). Pragmatik: Fenomena ketidaksantunan berbahasa. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Ridwan, M. H., & Khamidah, N. (2021). Kesantunan Berbahasa Dewan Juri Ragam Acara “Beraksi Di Rumah Saja” Di Indosiar (Kajian Sosiopragmatik). Jurnal Peneroka, 1(02), 223-238.
Sa'diya, IM, Rahmayantis, MD, & Lailiyah, N. (2025). Fenomena Kesantunan Berbahasa Pada Konten Akun TikTok “Iben Ma” Kajian Pragmatik. Dalam Prosiding SEMDIKJAR (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran) (Vol. 8, pp. 1875-1885). https://doi.org/10.29407/0ec5nq2
Setianawati, L. (2023). Analisis Dampak Penggunaan Aplikasi Tiktok Pada Remaja Terhadap Adab Dan Perilaku Kepada Orang Tua. Seroja : Jurnal Pendidikan, 2(3), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.572349/seroja.v2i3.716
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sulistyawati. (2023). Buku Ajar Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: K-Media.
Susanto, RNVS (2024). Kesantunan Berbahasa Perspektif Leech dalam Dialog Lintas Agama: Studi Kasus Habib Husein Ja'far dan Pendeta Marcel. Jurnal PENEROKA , 4 (2), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.30739/peneroka.v4i2.3060
Yule, G. (2006). Pragmatik (R. Mustajab, Terj.). Pustaka Pelajar. (Karya asli diterbitkan tahun 1996)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wenny Nur Hamidah, Charisya Eka Anindya Shaputri Shaputri, Tika Yunia Saputri, Diah Lailatul Nikmah, Nur Lailiyah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in Jurnal PENEROKA: Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).













